Quantcast
  Free Trial!
  Today’s Best Stocks!   

Forex

Trading Ideas

Daily Forex Ideas


Trading Lessons

Strategies
Interviews
Glossary
All Trading Lessons


Indicators

Forex Momentum Index
Forex Volatility Rankings
Economic Calendar
Interest Rate Tracker
Fibonacci Calculator
Forex Pivots
Profit and Loss Calculator


Quotes & Charts

Forex Quote
Charts


Daily Stock Setups

Connors Daily Battle Plan
Haggerty Professional
Kaltbaum Intra-day Set-ups
Short Term PowerRatings
Long Term PowerRatings
TM Indicators


Trading News

Markets Updates
Technical Alerts
Breaking News


PowerRatings

Short Term
Long Term
Charts


Indicators

Strategy Finder
Stocks
Market Bias


Quotes

Markets
Stocks
Charts
Level II
Historical Data
Forex


Trading Contests

Up or Down




Leveraging with Futures, FX and Binaries
By Robert Dubil, Ph.D. | TradingMarkets.com | October 24, 2006
Stocks RSS

Experienced traders who want to increase their returns often use leverage. This enables them to use small amounts of cash to control a large amount of assets. However, leverage has its dangers too and one would be well advised to understand what those dangers are before actively participating in instruments which employ leverage.

Futures traders do it. They post a small amount of margin and move 5000 oz. of silver or 1000 barrels of oil. FX traders do it. Most FX shops offer 100:1 leverage on large accounts or even 200:1 on smaller accounts. Options traders do it too. Or at least binary options traders. When they buy a binary for $2 and sell minutes later for $8, while the underlying asset barely moved, they use leverage.

Let us look at three leveraging alternatives: futures, spot FX and binaries. In each we put up some cash upfront in the form of a margin or an option premium, and then we speculate on the movement in the price of the underlying asset. Leverage magnifies the impact of the price movements on our profit and loss, so that a small movement in the underlying price causes a large change to our cash position.

Futures and FX

When trading futures, we are required to post an initial margin and stay above a maintenance margin as specified by the exchange. For example, as of September 20, 2006, NYMEX non-member traders were subject to the following margin requirements:



If you deposited $5,400 in the margin account to buy 1 futures contract on silver, your money controlled 5000 oz. of silver or a total value of $55,000. If silver went up by $1, you gained $5000, and your cash position increased to $10,400. For a $1/11.50 or 8.7% increase in silver price, your profit was 5000/5400 or 92.6%.

When trading spot FX, we post a 1% (100:1) or 0.5% (200:1) margin. If, when the USD/EUR rate is 1.2700, you deposit $1270 into your margin account to buy euros/sell dollars, you control €100,000. If the USD/EUR rate moves from 1.2700 to 1.2750, you gain $0.005 per €1 for a total of $500. For a 0.005/1.2700 or 0.39% move in the currency rate, you gain 500/1270 or 39.37% on your money.

So, the real question is, how do the margin requirements compare to the potential movements in gold, silver or $/€ rates that we observe? I took gold prices and $/€ rates over the period from August 2, 2006, to February 2, 2006, and computed the absolute daily price movements (not percent returns) and the following summary statistics:



On average, the USD/EUR rate moves by 3.5 pips per day and gold moves by $3.96 per day. The maximum FX rate change observed over the period is 22 pips; the maximum gold price change is $14.00. Let us assume that we face an average day.

If we post $3,375 on a 100 troy oz. gold contract trading at $585, and the price moves by $3.96, our gain will be $396. For a price move of 3.96/585=0.7% we make 396/3375=11.7%.

If we post $1270 on a €100,000 spot FX buy-€ position, and the rate moves up by 0.0035, our gain will be $350. For a rate move of 0.0035/1.2700=0.28%, we make 27.6%.

In both cases, if the price moved against us, our losses would have been magnified by the same leverage factor. So the leverage game is not for people with weak hearts.

Binaries

Option leverage is not symmetrical. It magnifies both gains and losses, but not by the same factor. Let us illustrate on the example of HedgeStreet binaries which offer more leverage at-the-money than standard calls and puts.

A binary is an all-or-nothing option with a fixed payout. If the underlying crosses the strike into the money, you get a fixed dollar amount, not the difference between the underlying price and the strike, like with standard calls. HedgeStreet trades binaries with $10 or $100 payouts.

If gold is at $578 and you buy a $10 binary on gold struck at $580, your payout will be $0 if gold stays below $580, but $10 if gold ends up above $580, even if just by a penny! With gold at $581 a standard call pays $1, a binary call pays $10. Prior to expiry, the price of a binary reflects the probability of ending up in the money, so with gold at $578, a 580 binary is likely to trade at $2-$3.

The source of leverage in a binary is twofold. First, just like with futures or FX, a $2 investment controls $578 worth of an asset (in the parlance of FX trading this would imply 289:1 leverage). Second, because of its all-or-nothing nature, the payout of a binary jumps by more than the price (delta > 1). With futures or FX, the payout moves one-for-one (delta = 1); with standard options, the payout often moves by less than one-for-one (delta ? 1). If gold moves by $3.96, from $578 to $581.96, and the time to expiry runs out, the 3.96/578 = 0.63% move in the price of gold will produce a $8/$2 = 400% return on the binary investment. Not bad.

Of course, just like with futures and FX, if the price goes down, the loss will be leveraged. In the case of futures and FX, the loss leverage is the same as the profit leverage, but not so with binaries. A 0.63% move down in the price of gold will produce a 100% loss (the entire $2 premium will be lost).

One last point is that the binary leverage depends on the entry point. If you buy the option for $3, the potential trade-off is between a 233% gain ($7) and 100% loss ($3); at $4 it is 150% vs. 100%.

Which is better?

Whatever you do, have Tums® ready to the rescue.

Robert Dubil, Ph.D., is the Chief Market Strategist at HedgeStreet.com, and Assoc. Professor–Lecturer of Finance at the University of Utah. To subscribe to his Weekly Market Outlook, register at www.hedgestreet.com. His Q&A address is DrBob@HedgeStreet.com.


® Tums is a registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline.


Stocks RSS
Related Articles

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER

The TradingMarkets Directory
Stocks
Quotes
Charts
How to Trade
Commentary and Analysis
PowerRatings
Training Classes
Tools
Stock Scanner
Daily Market Bias

Options
Quotes
Charts
How to Trade
Commentary and Analysis

Forex
How to Trade
Forex Momentum Index
Pivots

E-mini/Futures
Quotes
Charts
How to Trade
Daily Market Bias

How to Trade
Stocks
Options
Forex
E-mini/Futures
Glossary

Tools
Short Term PowerRatings
Long Term PowerRatings
Stock Screener
Quotes & Charts
Stock Indicators
Market bias Indicators

PowerRatings
Short Term PowerRatings
Long Term PowerRatings
Industry PowerRatings
PowerRatings Charts
Training Classes
PowerRatings Strategies
Search PowerRatings

Trading Contests
Up or Down Stock Contest
#1 - Win $1000 every month

Up or Down Forex Contest -
Win $1000 every month


Premium Subscription Services
Short Term PowerRatings Free Trial
Long Term PowerRatings Free Trial
TradingMarkets Subscription Free Trial
Daily Battle Plan Free Trial
Gary Kaltbaum - Intraday Breaking Alerts Free Trial
Kevin Haggerty Professional Trading Service Free Trial
Forex Force with Mark Whistler Free Trial

RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex





All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.