Quantcast
Free Trial!
Today’s Best Stocks To Trade!  Click Here





Return On Equity: How I Use It To Find Stocks With Fuel To Keep Rising

By Loren Fleckenstein | TradingMarkets.com
Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS

I'm a trader, not a quant. I buy off price-and-volume signals, not valuation metrics. But the intermediate-term momentum trader still targets companies with fundamental traits most likely to drive cash into, or out of, stocks.

For bullish trades, the prime fundamental trait is earnings growth. But some level of earnings growth is no great feat. After all, if a company plows part of its profits back into the business, it starts the following year with greater resources to raise sales and net income.

True leaders deliver powerful profit growth even after factoring out this effect. The gauge for this kind of growth is return on equity, or ROE.

Return on equity is yearly net income divided by shareholders' equity straightforward, then multiplied by 100 to convert the ratio into a percentage. Most ROE calculations add a company's beginning and ending equity for a given year and divide that sum by 2 to provide an average for the year.

As a general rule, the higher the return on equity, the better. A high or improving ROE indicates management's ability to deliver the most bang for the buck. Strong ROE tends to be a good forecaster of strong future earnings growth. I find ROE most useful to identify leaders within an industry.

As the following tables show, a steady ROE requires high earnings growth, whereas modest growth, all other things being equal, can lead to a falling ROE. Weakening ROEs often portend earnings growth deceleration to come.

Year

Base Equity millions $

Net Income millions $

Net Income Growth %

Return on Equity %

1998 35.0 10.0 29 25

1999

45.0 12.9 29 25
2000 57.9 16.5 29 25
2001 74.4 21.2 29 25
2002 95.6 27.3 29 25
2003 122.9 35.1 29 25
2004 158.0 45.1 29 25

Source: Timothy P. Vick, Wall Street on Sale (McGraw-Hill 1999)

Year

Base Equity millions $

Net Income millions $

Net Income Growth %

Return on Equity %

1998 35.0 10.0 15 25
1999 45.0 11.5 15 23
2000 56.5 13.2 15 21
2001 69.7 15.2 15 20
2002 84.9 17.5 15 19
2003 102.4 20.1 15 18
2004 122.5 23.1 15 17

Source: Vick

When assessing a company's ROE, run a parallel check on its debt-to-equity ratio. All things being equal, greater debt is undesirable. However, because rising debt reduces equity, it inflates the ROE ratio. So as a general rule, discount improving ROEs that coincide with rising debt.

Watch out for the effects of one-time charges on ROE. Charges marking down a company's asset base lower equity in turn, shrinking the denominator and generating a higher ratio. equity)

Sustaining high ROE in the absence of rising debt is no small accomplishment. For a case in point, business valuation expert Timothy Vick cites Callaway Golf (ELY | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating), which delivered ROEs averaging 43% between 1993 and 1997 while retiring long-term debt, an extraordinary accomplishment. Those years coincided with a terrific run in Callaway's share price.

For The Best Trading Books, Video Courses and Software To Improve Your Trading Click Here


>> See more articles by Loren Fleckenstein
Stocks RSS
Related Articles
More Related Articles >>
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex

All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.