Quantcast
 
New book by Larry Connors Click here Improve your trading - See how


 

Shopping center project on hold: Home Depot pulls out of the planned $40million center on U.S.74 in western Monroe.

Sun. July 13, 2008; Posted: 01:13 AM
Stocks RSS
MONROE, Jul 13, 2008 (The Charlotte Observer - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- HD | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- The withdrawal of a key tenant leaves the future in doubt for a planned $40 million shopping center on U.S. 74 in western Monroe.

Home Depot, originally expected to be one of three anchor stores, now says it won't build a store at Secrest Place shopping center east of Rocky River Road.

"We re-evaluated the site, and it no longer worked for us, based on the financials behind the deal," company spokesman Craig Fischel said. "... We're trying to be more strategic about where we open new locations."

The home improvement store's decision has forced the developer to put the 78-acre shopping center project on hold, said Kirk Rankin, a manager with Chattanooga, Tenn.-based Fletcher Bright Co.

The developer had hoped to break ground this month. The firm learned in May that Home Depot was out, Rankin said.

"We don't have enough (tenants) to fill all the square footage," Rankin said. "We did have some commitments from other national tenants, but those are not sufficient to make the project happen by themselves."

Another anchor was expected to be a Kohl's clothing store. Rankin declined to say who the third might be. He said Fletcher Bright is trying to woo another national retailer to take Home Depot's place.

Atlanta-based Home Depot has seen its fortunes sag as the housing crisis has deepened. The company already has a store in nearby Matthews on U.S. 74.

The shopping center's delay is a blow to the city's drive to expand its commercial tax base.

"The city will continue to be supportive of it," Assistant City Manager Wayne Herron said. "We certainly hate that Home Depot has chosen not to be here at this time."

The planned shopping center has been controversial because of a dispute over the design of its entrance on U.S. 74.

N.C. Board of Transportation member Tony Dennis of Stanly County had questioned whether the turn lane and stoplight plans the developer wanted did enough to keep traffic moving along the clogged highway in western Monroe.

DOT designers have been looking at "superstreet" designs that allow no left turns. But the developer wanted shoppers to be able to turn left out of the shopping center.

City Attorney Terry Sholar asked the state attorney general's office to investigate whether Dennis and his predecessor, Larry Helms of Indian Trail, had pressured state transportation engineers to reverse earlier indications of approval for a modified superstreet design allowing left turns. Helms had spoken against placing regular traffic signals at the shopping center.

In the end, the dispute turned out to be a misunderstanding, city and state officials said. The city withdrew its complaint to the attorney general.

The project also has ties to some city and state elected officials.

Most of the acreage is owned by Monroe-Independence LLC. The real estate investment firm lists N.C. Sen. Robert Pittenger, a Charlotte Republican, as a managing member, according to documents on file with the N.C. Secretary of State. Pittenger is running for lieutenant governor.

Monroe City Council member John Ashcraft was the broker for Monroe-Independence LLC. He removed himself from discussions and votes when the council considered the project. Ashcraft also has said he did not take part in planning the project.

The withdrawal of a key tenant leaves the future in doubt for a planned $40 million shopping center on U.S. 74 in western Monroe.

Home Depot, originally expected to be one of three anchor stores, now says it won't build a store at Secrest Place shopping center east of Rocky River Road.

"We re-evaluated the site, and it no longer worked for us, based on the financials behind the deal," company spokesman Craig Fischel said. "... We're trying to be more strategic about where we open new locations."

The home improvement store's decision has forced the developer to put the 78-acre shopping center project on hold, said Kirk Rankin, a manager with Chattanooga, Tenn.-based Fletcher Bright Co.

The developer had hoped to break ground this month. The firm learned in May that Home Depot was out, Rankin said.

"We don't have enough (tenants) to fill all the square footage," Rankin said. "We did have some commitments from other national tenants, but those are not sufficient to make the project happen by themselves."

Another anchor was expected to be a Kohl's clothing store. Rankin declined to say who the third might be. He said Fletcher Bright is trying to woo another national retailer to take Home Depot's place.

Atlanta-based Home Depot has seen its fortunes sag as the housing crisis has deepened. The company already has a store in nearby Matthews on U.S. 74.

The shopping center's delay is a blow to the city's drive to expand its commercial tax base.

"The city will continue to be supportive of it," Assistant City Manager Wayne Herron said. "We certainly hate that Home Depot has chosen not to be here at this time."

The planned shopping center has been controversial because of a dispute over the design of its entrance on U.S. 74.

N.C. Board of Transportation member Tony Dennis of Stanly County had questioned whether the turn lane and stoplight plans the developer wanted did enough to keep traffic moving along the clogged highway in western Monroe.

DOT designers have been looking at "superstreet" designs that allow no left turns. But the developer wanted shoppers to be able to turn left out of the shopping center.

City Attorney Terry Sholar asked the state attorney general's office to investigate whether Dennis and his predecessor, Larry Helms of Indian Trail, had pressured state transportation engineers to reverse earlier indications of approval for a modified superstreet design allowing left turns. Helms had spoken against placing regular traffic signals at the shopping center.

In the end, the dispute turned out to be a misunderstanding, city and state officials said. The city withdrew its complaint to the attorney general.

The project also has ties to some city and state elected officials.

Most of the acreage is owned by Monroe-Independence LLC. The real estate investment firm lists N.C. Sen. Robert Pittenger, a Charlotte Republican, as a managing member, according to documents on file with the N.C. Secretary of State. Pittenger is running for lieutenant governor.

Monroe City Council member John Ashcraft was the broker for Monroe-Independence LLC. He removed himself from discussions and votes when the council considered the project. Ashcraft also has said he did not take part in planning the project.

To see more of The Charlotte Observer, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.charlotte.com. Copyright (c) 2008, The Charlotte Observer, N.C. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

For full details on Home Depot Inc (HD) click here. Home Depot Inc (HD) has Short Term PowerRatings of 5. Details on Home Depot Inc (HD) Short Term PowerRatings is available at This Link.

    


More News:   Market Updates | Stock Alerts | All Trading News | Stock Index

Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS





Related News [HD]
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
 
The TradingMarkets Directory
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex
Please call 1-213-955-5858 ext. 1

About TradingMarkets | Contact | Advertise | Careers | Link to Us | Site Map | Help | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Return Policy | Testimonials | Feedback

Disclaimer:

The Connors Group, Inc. ("Company") is not an investment advisory service, nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities or currencies customers should buy or sell for themselves. The analysts and employees or affiliates of Company may hold positions in the stocks, currencies or industries discussed here. You understand and acknowledge that there is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities and/or currencies. The Company, the authors, the publisher, and all affiliates of Company assume no responsibility or liability for your trading and investment results. Factual statements on the Company's website, or in its publications, are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice.

It should not be assumed that the methods, techniques, or indicators presented in these products will be profitable or that they will not result in losses. Past results of any individual trader or trading system published by Company are not indicative of future returns by that trader or system, and are not indicative of future returns which be realized by you. In addition, the indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features of Company's products (collectively, the "Information") are provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Examples presented on Company's website are for educational purposes only. Such set-ups are not solicitations of any order to buy or sell. Accordingly, you should not rely solely on the Information in making any investment. Rather, you should use the Information only as a starting point for doing additional independent research in order to allow you to form your own opinion regarding investments. You should always check with your licensed financial advisor and tax advisor to determine the suitability of any investment.

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING AND MAY NOT BE IMPACTED BY BROKERAGE AND OTHER SLIPPAGE FEES. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

The Connors Group, Inc.
15260 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 2200
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

© Copyright 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.


All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.