Quantcast
 
New book by Larry Connors Click here Improve your trading - See how


 

J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Deterioration in Vehicle Quality During the First Three Years of Ownership Has a Major Impact on Customer Satisfaction and Advocacy

Thu. August 07, 2008; Posted: 07:00 AM
Stocks RSS
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif., Aug 07, 2008 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- MHP | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- Deterioration in vehicle quality during the first three years of ownership -- determined by comparing long-term dependability rates to initial quality problem rates -- strongly affects overall customer satisfaction as well as customer willingness to recommend their vehicle model, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2008 Vehicle Dependability Study(SM) (VDS) released today.

(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20050527/LAF028LOGO-a)

The study, which measures problems experienced by original owners of 3-year-old (2005 model year) vehicles, finds that, on average, customers report experiencing 75 percent more problems in the third year of ownership than during the first 90 days. Those models with the largest increase in problem levels show the most pronounced declines in satisfaction and the likelihood of owners to recommend their vehicle model. In addition, while no model has fewer reported problems in the third year of ownership compared with the first three months, those models that average less than 35 percent problem growth actually demonstrate improvement in overall satisfaction during the three-year period.

"Understanding and minimizing quality deterioration is critical for manufacturers, as it is a key driver of owner satisfaction and word of mouth recommendations," said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power and Associates. "It is imperative that manufacturers design models that not only achieve high levels of initial quality but also attain high levels of longer-term dependability. Vehicle models that stand the test of time will help automaker profitability through superior owner satisfaction and recommendation rates."

The study also finds that five of the top 10 problems reported industry-wide in the 2008 Vehicle Dependability Study were also among the top 10 most frequently reported problems in the 2005 Initial Quality Study, suggesting that the problems are identified by owners during the initial ownership period, but have not been rectified by automakers during the three-year ownership period.

The problems include: 1. Excessive wind noise 2. Noisy brakes 3. Vehicle pulling to the left or right 4. Issues with the instrument panel/dashboard 5. Excessive window fogging

"Although automakers have achieved tremendous gains in initial quality and dependability in recent years by specifically addressing customer concerns, these particular problems still prove challenging for manufacturers," said Sargent. "The fact that these problems have endured throughout the industry for many years suggests that additional focus on these issues prior to vehicle launch would benefit not only consumers, but also automakers through increased customer satisfaction."

For a 14th consecutive year, Lexus ranks highest in vehicle dependability, improving by 25 problems per 100 vehicles since 2007 to achieve a score of 120 PP100. Following in the top five rankings are Mercury, Cadillac, Toyota and Acura, respectively.

In addition, Lexus garners six segment awards -- the most of any nameplate in 2008 -- for the ES 330, GX 470, IS 300, LS 430, LX 470 and SC 430. Toyota follows with five segment awards for the Highlander, Prius, RAV4, Sequoia, and Tundra. Ford and Honda each capture two awards. Ford models receiving awards are the Crown Victoria and Ranger, while Honda earns awards for the Element and S2000. Models by Buick, Chevrolet, Hyundai, Mazda and Mercury each rank highest in one segment.

SAAB is the most improved brand in the study, although it continues to rank below the industry average. SAAB improves by 65 PP100 since 2007.

The study finds that long-term vehicle quality has improved by 5 percent industry-wide in 2008 -- with an overall decrease of 10 problems per 100 vehicles -- compared with 2007. More than 60 percent of the 38 nameplates included in the study improve in 2008, compared with 2007. Among the 19 segments included in the study, the midsize premium MAV segment demonstrates the most improvement in 2008 -- 36 PP100 fewer than in 2007. The compact car and midsize car segments also have much lower problem levels in 2008 than in 2007, and together account for more than one-half of the overall industry improvement.

"The gains in dependability for compact and midsize vehicles are good news for consumers who are downsizing their vehicles due to increasing fuel prices," said Sargent. "Consumers who purchase these smaller vehicles benefit not only from immediate gains in fuel economy, but also from improvements in long-term dependability, compared with previous years."

The 2008 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 52,000 original owners of 2005 model-year vehicles. The study was fielded from January through April 2008.

Find more detailed findings on vehicle dependability as well as model photos and specs by watching a video, reading an article and reviewing brand and segment dependability ratings at JDPower.com.

About J.D. Power and Associates

Headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif., J.D. Power and Associates is a global marketing information services company operating in key business sectors including market research, forecasting, performance improvement, training and customer satisfaction. The company's quality and satisfaction measurements are based on responses from millions of consumers annually. For more information on car reviews and ratings, car insurance, health insurance, cell phone ratings, and more, please visit JDPower.com. J.D. Power and Associates is a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies.

About The McGraw-Hill Companies

Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies (NYSE: MHP | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating) is a leading global information services provider meeting worldwide needs in the financial services, education and business information markets through leading brands such as Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill Education, BusinessWeek and J.D. Power and Associates. The Corporation has more than 280 offices in 40 countries. Sales in 2007 were $6.8 billion. Additional information is available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.

J.D. Power and Associates Media Relations Contacts: John Tews Syvetril Perryman Troy, Mich. Westlake Village, Calif. (248) 312-4119 (805) 418-8103 john.tews@jdpa.com syvetril.perryman@jdpa.com

No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates. http://www.jdpower.com/corporate

2008 Nameplate VDS Ranking Problems Per 100 Vehicles Lexus 120 Mercury 151 Cadillac 155 Toyota 159 Acura 160 Buick 163 BMW 164 Lincoln 165 Honda 177 Jaguar 178 Porsche 193 Mitsubishi 197 Hyundai 200 Ford 204 Infiniti 204 Industry Average 206 Audi 207 Mercedes-Benz 215 Nissan 224 Pontiac 225 GMC 226 Mazda 228 Subaru 228 Chrysler 229 Dodge 230 MINI 233 Chevrolet 239 HUMMER 241 Scion 243 Volvo 244 Saturn 250 Jeep 253 Volkswagen 253 SAAB 254 Isuzu 274 Kia 278 Suzuki 302 Land Rover 344

Note: Maserati is included in the study but not ranked due to small sample size.

Top Three Models per Segment Car Segments Sub-Compact Car Highest Ranked: Hyundai Accent Scion xA Chevrolet Aveo Compact Car Highest Ranked: Toyota Prius Mitsubishi Lancer Toyota Corolla Compact Sporty Car Highest Ranked: Mazda Miata Toyota Celica Subaru Outback Sport Midsize Sporty Car Highest Ranked: Chevrolet Monte Carlo Toyota Camry Solara Coupe/Convertible Mitsubishi Eclipse Midsize Car Highest Ranked: Buick Century Mercury Sable Toyota Camry Sedan Large Car Highest Ranked: Ford Crown Victoria Mercury Grand Marquis Buick Park Avenue Compact Premium Sporty Car Highest Ranked: Honda S2000 BMW Z4 (tie) Porsche Boxster (tie) Entry Premium Vehicle Highest Ranked: Lexus IS 300/IS 300 SportCross BMW 3 Series BMW X3 Midsize Premium Car Highest Ranked: Lexus ES 330 Lexus GS 300/GS 430 Acura RL Large Premium Car Highest Ranked: Lexus LS 430 Lincoln Town Car Cadillac DeVille Premium Sporty Car Highest Ranked: Lexus SC 430 Ford Thunderbird Porsche 911 Top Three Models per Segment Truck / Multi-Activity Vehicle (MAV) Segments Compact MAV Highest Ranked: Honda Element (tie) Toyota RAV4 (tie) Honda CR-V Midsize MAV Highest Ranked: Toyota Highlander Buick Rainier Mercury Mountaineer Large MAV Highest Ranked: Toyota Sequoia Chevrolet Suburban Ford Excursion Large Pickup Highest Ranked: Toyota Tundra Ford F-150 LD Dodge Ram Pickup LD Midsize Pickup Highest Ranked: Ford Ranger Toyota Tacoma Dodge Dakota Van Highest Ranked: Mercury Monterey Ford E-Series GMC Savana Midsize Premium MAV Highest Ranked: Lexus GX 470 Lexus RX 330 Volvo XC70 Large Premium MAV Highest Ranked: Lexus LX 470 Cadillac Escalade EXT Cadillac Escalade/Escalade ESV Available Topic Expert(s): For information on the listed expert(s), click appropriate link. Neal Oddes https://profnet.prnewswire.com/Subscriber/ExpertProfile.aspx?ei=58144

SOURCE J.D. Power and Associates

http://www.jdpower.com

For full details on Mcgraw-Hill Companies (MHP) click here. Mcgraw-Hill Companies (MHP) has Short Term PowerRatings of 5. Details on Mcgraw-Hill Companies (MHP) Short Term PowerRatings is available at This Link.

    


More News:   Market Updates | Stock Alerts | All Trading News | Stock Index

Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS





Related News [MHP]
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
 
The TradingMarkets Directory
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex
Please call 1-213-955-5858 ext. 1

About TradingMarkets | Contact | Advertise | Careers | Link to Us | Site Map | Help | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Return Policy | Testimonials | Feedback

Disclaimer:

The Connors Group, Inc. ("Company") is not an investment advisory service, nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities or currencies customers should buy or sell for themselves. The analysts and employees or affiliates of Company may hold positions in the stocks, currencies or industries discussed here. You understand and acknowledge that there is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities and/or currencies. The Company, the authors, the publisher, and all affiliates of Company assume no responsibility or liability for your trading and investment results. Factual statements on the Company's website, or in its publications, are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice.

It should not be assumed that the methods, techniques, or indicators presented in these products will be profitable or that they will not result in losses. Past results of any individual trader or trading system published by Company are not indicative of future returns by that trader or system, and are not indicative of future returns which be realized by you. In addition, the indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features of Company's products (collectively, the "Information") are provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Examples presented on Company's website are for educational purposes only. Such set-ups are not solicitations of any order to buy or sell. Accordingly, you should not rely solely on the Information in making any investment. Rather, you should use the Information only as a starting point for doing additional independent research in order to allow you to form your own opinion regarding investments. You should always check with your licensed financial advisor and tax advisor to determine the suitability of any investment.

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING AND MAY NOT BE IMPACTED BY BROKERAGE AND OTHER SLIPPAGE FEES. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

The Connors Group, Inc.
15260 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 2200
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

© Copyright 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.


All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.