Quantcast
 
New book by Larry Connors Click here Improve your trading - See how


 

Daniel Craig brings Bond, grimmer now, out of the 20th century

Fri. November 14, 2008; Posted: 12:05 PM
Stocks RSS
Nov 14, 2008 (The Lexington Herald-Leader - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- ROAL | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- Putting together a set of James Bond polls for my blog last week (see results, above) in anticipation of Friday's opening of the spy's latest adventure, Quantum of Solace, it occurred to me that I was assembling questions about the 20th-century 007.

The first inkling was the henchmen question. In the first 20 or so Bond films, most of the villains came with colorful henchmen -- Oddjob, the brick wall of an Asian man who could throw his steel-rimmed bowler with laser precision in Goldfinger (1963); or Jaws, the steel-toothed terror of two late-'70s Bonds. Then there were gadgets: the watches with lasers and circular saws, or the cars that dropped oil slicks and converted into submarines.

Even the women, suggestively named Bond babes such as Pussy Galore and Agent XXX, were more a product of male fantasy, unlike businesslike Vesper Lynd from Casino Royale in 2006.

Indeed, Casino Royale signaled an end to a certain part of the fantasy of Bond.

It was a fantasy that started in the 1960s with Sean Connery but was really cemented by Roger Moore in the '70s and early '80s. Moore blithely tripped through seven Bond adventures with a quip for every occasion but nary a scratch. What guy wouldn't want to be James Bond? You could go to the best places, eat the best food, have the best vodka shaken, not stirred, in your martinis and have the most beautiful women in the world fall at your feet. And you could do all this without really being in any danger.

Moore recently told England's Guardian newspaper that his Bond was "a lover," while new Bond Daniel Craig is "a killer."

Certainly, Craig's Bond ended up in more unenviable positions in one movie than Moore had in seven. That grisly torture scene probably would persuade a lot of us to pass on a license to kill.

But that is probably more realistic. I cannot speak from any first-hand knowledge of what life as an international spy is like, but I have read numerous accounts that say it is not nearly as glamorous a life as the Bond movies make it out to be and that it is a life that can leave a soul dark and cold.

The new Bond seems to have a soul, which can be seen in the plot for Quantum of Solace, a sequel to Casino Royale.

The new movie's title is taken from a Bond short story by Ian Fleming, although that story bears no resemblance to the plot outline for the movie.

The relationship between the two might be in Bond's soul.

The short story is about a late-night conversation between Bond and the governor of Nassau. The politician tells the story of a man whose wife flagrantly cheated on him, and the phrase "quantum of solace" refers to a trace of compassion or affection someone feels for someone else even after being grossly betrayed.

Certainly, Bond ended Royale feeling grossly betrayed by Vesper, with whom he had fallen in love. It turned out that she had sent the money he won at Casino Royale, in an effort to foil an international terrorist financier, to other bad guys who were blackmailing her.

Despite the betrayal, Bond enters Quantum of Solace bent on avenging Vesper's death. Early reviews characterize this as an angry Bond with little sense of fun -- no gadgets, no quips, and apparently a fairly platonic relationship with the requisite Bond babe.

Bond certainly has had to change with the times. The feminist movement of the 1970s made the sexism of early Bonds seem Neanderthal. In the 1990s, his promiscuity seemed as foolish as jumping into a lake of alligators as the realities of the AIDS epidemic came to light.

A classic line in Bond-dom came from Judi Dench in her first scene as M, in 1995's GoldenEye. Meeting with Bond, played by Pierce Brosnan, she told him, "I think you're a sexist, misogynist dinosaur."

In the new Bonds, Dench's M still has misgivings about 007, but the relationship is almost maternal, with a lot of talk about Bond's emotions.

Two of the most striking poll questions were on the best Bond and best Bond movie. Sean Connery and Goldfinger were the big winners as best Bond and best Bond movie They are in many surveys, and respondents revealed a taste for classic Bond. But Craig and Casino Royale each placed a strong second, reflecting the enthusiastic reception for the rebooted series in its first outing.

We are being reintroduced to Bond. In Casino Royale, he didn't care how his martini was made, and apparently Quantum offers a moment when he learns the art of the drink. We also see how his soul is being shaped by harrowing, shattering early adventures.

In these new movies, James Bond is being rebuilt, but as a more realistic, human character. He's being rebuilt for the 21st century.

Reach Rich Copley at (859) 231-3217 or 1-800-950-6397, Ext. 3217.

To see more of the Lexington Herald-Leader, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.kentucky.com. Copyright (c) 2008, The Lexington Herald-Leader, Ky. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

For full details for ROAL click here.

    


More News:   Market Updates | Stock Alerts | All Trading News | Stock Index

Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS





Most Popular News
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
 
The TradingMarkets Directory
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex
Please call 1-213-955-5858 ext. 1

About TradingMarkets | Contact | Advertise | Careers | Link to Us | Site Map | Help | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Return Policy | Testimonials | Feedback

Disclaimer:

The Connors Group, Inc. ("Company") is not an investment advisory service, nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities or currencies customers should buy or sell for themselves. The analysts and employees or affiliates of Company may hold positions in the stocks, currencies or industries discussed here. You understand and acknowledge that there is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities and/or currencies. The Company, the authors, the publisher, and all affiliates of Company assume no responsibility or liability for your trading and investment results. Factual statements on the Company's website, or in its publications, are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice.

It should not be assumed that the methods, techniques, or indicators presented in these products will be profitable or that they will not result in losses. Past results of any individual trader or trading system published by Company are not indicative of future returns by that trader or system, and are not indicative of future returns which be realized by you. In addition, the indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features of Company's products (collectively, the "Information") are provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Examples presented on Company's website are for educational purposes only. Such set-ups are not solicitations of any order to buy or sell. Accordingly, you should not rely solely on the Information in making any investment. Rather, you should use the Information only as a starting point for doing additional independent research in order to allow you to form your own opinion regarding investments. You should always check with your licensed financial advisor and tax advisor to determine the suitability of any investment.

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING AND MAY NOT BE IMPACTED BY BROKERAGE AND OTHER SLIPPAGE FEES. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

The Connors Group, Inc.
15260 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 2200
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

© Copyright 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.


All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.