Quantcast
 
New book by Larry Connors Click here Improve your trading - See how


 

Cyber-bullying jury breaks for the night

Tue. November 25, 2008; Posted: 08:47 PM
Stocks RSS
Nov 25, 2008 (St. Louis Post-Dispatch - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- NWS | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- UPDATED 7 P.M.

LOS ANGELES -- Federal jurors here told a judge late today that they had reached a decision on three of the four charges against accused cyber bully Lori Drew, and asked him if it was all right to be deadlocked on the fourth,

U.S. District Judge George Wu told them that could be all right but sent them home for the night to continmue deliberating the fourth charge on Wednesday at 11 a.m. St. Louis time.

It is not known what they have decided, or on which counts.

Drew, 49, of O'Fallon, Mo., is charged with one count of conspiracy and three of illegally accessing protected computers, laws designed to stop hacking. The charges claim she harassed a 13-year-old neighbor, Megan Meier , who committed suicide in 2006.

Judge Wu sent the jury home about 7 p.m. St. Louis time, approximately eight hours into deliberations. They had broken for lunch for about one hour and 15 minutes.

About four hours earlier, jurors briefly returned to the courtroom to ask the judge to clarify their instructions.

- An older man who told lawyers during jury selection that he didn't understand the indictment.

- A man who says he was improperly stopped by police years ago and who was foreperson of a hung jury in a past case.

- A man who, when asked if he could put aside his preconceptions about the case said, "I think I can..."

- A young man with computer experience.

- And an unemployed former human-relations staffer who said she's been on MySpace for 1 1/2 years, and only after her son's girlfriend signed her up.

U.S. District Judge George H. Wu HAD dismissed the jury at 4:45 p.m. Monday after two hours of closing arguments. In making their final case, prosecutors and Drew's lawyer had differed markedly on what the jury actually had to decide in a trial that marks the first time an anti-hacking law has been used to go after cyber bullying.

Prosecutors said the jury only had to determine that Drew, 49, knew she was breaking the rules of MySpace when she and two others improperly accessed MySpace's computers to set up a fake account.

Using the persona of a 16-year-old boy named Josh Evans, prosecutors said, the trio wooed the Dardenne Prairie teen for weeks to gain her trust and find out what Megan had been saying about Drew's daughter, her former friend.

But the plan changed, U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien said. They later planned to humiliate her with a printout of the conversations.

They planned to "build her up to tear her down," Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Krause told jurors, and inflict "maximum humiliation on a teenage girl."

On Oct. 16, 2006, Megan's relationship with "Josh" dissolved into electronic combat -- actually between Megan and an 18-year-old former Drew employee, Ashley Grills, and others. In the end, Megan hanged herself in her bedroom.

O'Brien said that Drew knew that MySpace's terms of service bar harassment, lying and using false information, among other things.

She knew those terms based on the often-flip statements she made to others who questioned the plan, both before and after Megan's death, he said. And she should have known she would be violating them when both Grills and her daughter warned her against the plan, O'Brien said.

She also knew that Megan was depressed and had threatened or tried suicide in the past, and was particularly vulnerable to the harassment, prosecutors said.

EARLIER STORY:

LOS ANGELES -- Jurors will begin deciding the fate of accused cyber bully Lori Drew today, just under a week after her trial started and six months after she was indicted over computer crimes that allegedly led to the death of 13-year-old Megan Meier.

U.S. District Judge George H. Wu dismissed the jury at 4:45 p.m. Monday after two hours of closing arguments. In making their final case, prosecutors and Drew's lawyer had differed markedly on what the jury actually had to decide in a trial that marks the first time an anti-hacking law has been used to go after cyber bullying.

Prosecutors said the jury only had to determine that Drew, 49, of O'Fallon, Mo., knew she was breaking the rules of MySpace when she and two others improperly accessed MySpace's computers to set up a fake account.

Using the persona of a 16-year-old boy named Josh Evans, prosecutors said, the trio wooed the Dardenne Prairie teen for weeks to gain her trust and find out what Megan had been saying about Drew's daughter, her former friend.

But the plan changed, U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien said. They later planned to humiliate her with a printout of the conversations.

They planned to "build her up to tear her down," Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Krause told jurors, and inflict "maximum humiliation on a teenage girl."

On Oct. 16, 2006, Megan's relationship with "Josh" dissolved into electronic combat -- actually between Megan and an 18-year-old former Drew employee, Ashley Grills, and others. In the end, Megan hanged herself in her bedroom.

O'Brien said that Drew knew that MySpace's terms of service bar harassment, lying and using false information, among other things.

She knew those terms based on the often-flip statements she made to others who questioned the plan, both before and after Megan's death, he said. And she should have known she would be violating them when both Grills and her daughter warned her against the plan, O'Brien said.

She also knew that Megan was depressed and had threatened or tried suicide in the past, and was particularly vulnerable to the harassment, prosecutors said.

She could have talked to Megan's mother, let the girls work it out on their own or stopped the scheme at any time, O'Brien said. "She chose to use a computer, illegally, in order to hurt a little girl," he said.

But Drew's lawyer, H. Dean Steward, said that in order to find Drew guilty, jurors had to find that she knowingly and intentionally violated MySpace's terms of service.

Prosecutors presented no evidence that any of the alleged co-conspirators read or knew anything about the terms, however.

"How can you violate something when you don't know what it is?" Steward asked.

Without knowledge of the terms and a conscious decision to violate them, Steward said, "We are over. End of case."

The terms of service issue has dogged the case for months. Steward asked Wu to dismiss the case Friday, saying prosecutors had not proven the elements necessary under the law.

Wu seemed receptive, as he has in the past, taking up Steward's position.

He pointed out that the statute requires Drew to intentionally violate the terms or service, and asked, "How would they know unless they read the terms of service?"

In the end, Wu said he would need the weekend to decide.

On Monday morning, he told both sides that he would not yet issue a decision and to proceed with the end of testimony and closing arguments. By law, Wu could throw out the case after the jury has returned a guilty verdict -- if he ultimately agrees with Steward.

Drew showed little reaction to Monday's events, as she has throughout the case, even when her daughter was crying on the witness stand.

Drew's daughter Sarah began testifying Friday and finished Monday, placing most or all of the blame on Grills and defending her mother. Drew's father, Jerry Shreeves, also testified, telling jurors about the family's fear of retaliation after Megan's death and contradicting the testimony of a sheriff's deputy who came to the house, called Drew "creepy" and said she admitted typing some of the messages to Megan.

Wu told jurors to return to court today at 9 a.m. (11 a.m. St. Louis time) to begin their deliberations. Each of the four charges Drew faces -- conspiracy and three counts of accessing a protected computer without authorization -- carries a penalty of up to five years in prison.

To see more of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.stltoday.com. Copyright (c) 2008, St. Louis Post-Dispatch Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

For full details on News Corp Inc (NWS) click here. News Corp Inc (NWS) has Short Term PowerRatings of 5. Details on News Corp Inc (NWS) Short Term PowerRatings is available at This Link.

    


More News:   Market Updates | Stock Alerts | All Trading News | Stock Index

Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS





Related News [NWS]
  UPCOMING EVENTS
Learn new strategies, how to trade in this market, and the stocks you should be focusing on each day. Join us for our free 20 minute tele-seminars during the week.
* Attendance is strictly limited and are filled on a first-come, first-served basis.
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
 
The TradingMarkets Directory
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex
Please call 1-213-955-5858 ext. 1

About TradingMarkets | Contact | Advertise | Careers | Link to Us | Site Map | Help | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Return Policy | Testimonials | Feedback

Disclaimer:

The Connors Group, Inc. ("Company") is not an investment advisory service, nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities or currencies customers should buy or sell for themselves. The analysts and employees or affiliates of Company may hold positions in the stocks, currencies or industries discussed here. You understand and acknowledge that there is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities and/or currencies. The Company, the authors, the publisher, and all affiliates of Company assume no responsibility or liability for your trading and investment results. Factual statements on the Company's website, or in its publications, are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice.

It should not be assumed that the methods, techniques, or indicators presented in these products will be profitable or that they will not result in losses. Past results of any individual trader or trading system published by Company are not indicative of future returns by that trader or system, and are not indicative of future returns which be realized by you. In addition, the indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features of Company's products (collectively, the "Information") are provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Examples presented on Company's website are for educational purposes only. Such set-ups are not solicitations of any order to buy or sell. Accordingly, you should not rely solely on the Information in making any investment. Rather, you should use the Information only as a starting point for doing additional independent research in order to allow you to form your own opinion regarding investments. You should always check with your licensed financial advisor and tax advisor to determine the suitability of any investment.

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING AND MAY NOT BE IMPACTED BY BROKERAGE AND OTHER SLIPPAGE FEES. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

The Connors Group, Inc.
10 Exchange Place, Suite 1800
Jersey City, NJ 07302

© Copyright 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.


All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.