Quantcast
 
New book by Larry Connors Click here Improve your trading - See how


 

"Committee for Level Playing Field" Organized To Offer "Third Way" on Card Check Bill; Costco, Starbucks, and Whole Foods Market Are Founding Companies

Sat. March 21, 2009; Posted: 05:25 PM
Stocks RSS
WASHINGTON, Mar 21, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- SBUX | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- Committee for Level Playing Field:

WHAT:                 Briefing by Lanny J. Davis and Eileen O'Connor
                      Attorneys, Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, representing
                      Costco, Starbucks and Whole Foods Market
WHEN:                 Sunday, March 22, 2009, 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time
WHERE:                Telephone Number Call-in: 1-800-447-0521
                      International: 1-847-413-3238
                      Confirmation: 24178874
If you cannot make this call, please call Eileen O'Connor on
202 339 8463 or 202 997 1234.

Three leading companies in the areas of employee advocacy and innovative employment practices--Costco Wholesale Corp., Starbucks Coffee Corp. and Whole Foods Market, Inc.--today announced the formation of an ad hoc "Committee for a Level Playing Field for Union Elections." The group has come together to open dialogue about a "third way" approach to reform labor law. The Committee's purpose is to offer a new solution wholly distinct from the recently-introduced and controversial "card check" bill, the Employee Free Choice Act ("EFCA").

The founding companies that formed the Committee have consistently appeared on Fortune Magazine's 100 Best Companies to Work For. Their CEO's--James Sinegal of Costco, Howard Schultz of Starbucks, and John Mackey of Whole Foods Market--today introduced a "Statement of Principles," that, according to the Committee, would "substantially level the playing field for union organizers, improve their access to employees and provide a fair chance to make their case for a union election."

These principles, attached below, would guarantee a fixed time period for the secret-ballot election--by eliminating delays for establishing a day for a secret ballot to certify or decertify a union. The principles also include increased penalties for serious and pervasive violations of the law by labor or management and expedited procedures to impose them.

The Committee strongly opposes EFCA in its current form, which includes the abolition of a guaranteed option for management or employees to require a secret ballot, what they call a "bedrock principle of American democracy." The group also opposes EFCA's provision for government-imposed mandatory arbitration dictating terms of employment, which would overturn the time-valued tradition dating back to Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Wagner Act of 1935 that preserves private, good faith collective bargaining, free of government intrusion or dictates.

The Committee hopes that other companies, including representatives from labor organizations and public interest groups, will support this innovative, bipartisan "third way" approach.

"We believe in and trust our employees, which is neither anti-union nor pro-status quo," said James Sinegal of Costco. "We favor fairness and believe that the passage of a law based on these six principles will ensure a fair opportunity for workers to make an informed choice, with a secret ballot, whether they want a union or whether they wish to retain non-union status."

Lanny J. Davis, an attorney with the Washington D.C. office of the global law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, pointed out that, contrary to assertions made by supporters of EFCA, the card-check bill would, in fact, permit the exclusion of the secret ballot option. "It defies logic to say that once 51% of eligible voters sign the cards, the union that is entitled to automatic certification under EFCA would then ask for a secret ballot. That deprives the 49%, and perhaps some who signed the cards under pressure, the right to demand a secret ballot."

Davis said he has discussed the Statement of Principles with the staffs of almost two dozen Democratic and Republican Senators. Most, he said, indicated the Senators for whom they worked were "positive about our third way approach, including many Democratic Senators who were co-sponsors of EFCA and had voted for the same measure last year."

"I'm proud to call myself a pro-labor liberal Democrat who believes that reforms are needed to provide a level playing field for both labor and management, but not at the expense of a guaranteed option for a secret ballot by both workers and management and certainly not at the expense of preserving the historic process of private, voluntary collective bargaining. I consider the Committee's third way proposal based on these six principles to be favorable to labor and fair to management," Davis said. "If I did not, I would not have taken on this assignment."

"Given the severe economic crisis facing America it is time to avoid the polarization that has occurred on both sides of this issue, and instead, come together to find a productive approach," said Davis.

Committee for A Level Playing Field For Union Elections

II. Statement of Principles of Reform "Third Way" Legislation:

(1) Secret Ballot. Guarantee the right of management and unions to require a secret ballot under all circumstances.

(2) Certification and Decertification Treated Equally. Permit management to initiate a decertification campaign through a secret ballot election just as employees and unions are presently able to initiate certification and decertification campaigns.

(3) Date Certain for Elections. Guarantee a fixed time period for the secret-ballot election--i.e., do not permit delays of an established day for a secret ballot to certify or decertify a union.

(4) Equal Access to Employees for Campaign Purposes. Level playing field for unions and management to access employees during non-working hours during the campaign period, e.g., permitting each to make presentations to employees at a neutral location concerning the issue of whether to form a union.

(5) Expedited Enforcement and Stricter Penalties. Expedited enforcement for serious and pervasive violations of law by labor and management and stricter penalties for serious and pervasive violations (e.g., unlawful discharges), including the penalty of mandatory injunctions when appropriate.

(6) Preserve Private Collective Bargaining. No mandatory arbitration that dictates contract terms, but stricter penalties and expedited enforcement for violations of good faith bargaining rules, including an expedited timetable to begin bargaining after union certification.

SOURCE: Committee for Level Playing Field

Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe 
Eileen O'Connor, 202-339-8463 or 202-997-1234 
emoconnor@orrick.com 
or 
Cecelia Showalter, 202-339-8559 
cshowalter@orrick.com
For full details on Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) click here. Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) has Short Term PowerRatings of 5. Details on Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) Short Term PowerRatings is available at This Link.

    


More News:   Market Updates | Stock Alerts | All Trading News | Stock Index

Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS





Related News [SBUX]
  UPCOMING EVENTS
Learn new strategies, how to trade in this market, and the stocks you should be focusing on each day. Join us for our free 20 minute tele-seminars during the week.
* Attendance is strictly limited and are filled on a first-come, first-served basis.
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
 
The TradingMarkets Directory
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex
Please call 1-213-955-5858 ext. 1

About TradingMarkets | Contact | Advertise | Careers | Link to Us | Site Map | Help | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Return Policy | Testimonials | Feedback

Disclaimer:

The Connors Group, Inc. ("Company") is not an investment advisory service, nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities or currencies customers should buy or sell for themselves. The analysts and employees or affiliates of Company may hold positions in the stocks, currencies or industries discussed here. You understand and acknowledge that there is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities and/or currencies. The Company, the authors, the publisher, and all affiliates of Company assume no responsibility or liability for your trading and investment results. Factual statements on the Company's website, or in its publications, are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice.

It should not be assumed that the methods, techniques, or indicators presented in these products will be profitable or that they will not result in losses. Past results of any individual trader or trading system published by Company are not indicative of future returns by that trader or system, and are not indicative of future returns which be realized by you. In addition, the indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features of Company's products (collectively, the "Information") are provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Examples presented on Company's website are for educational purposes only. Such set-ups are not solicitations of any order to buy or sell. Accordingly, you should not rely solely on the Information in making any investment. Rather, you should use the Information only as a starting point for doing additional independent research in order to allow you to form your own opinion regarding investments. You should always check with your licensed financial advisor and tax advisor to determine the suitability of any investment.

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING AND MAY NOT BE IMPACTED BY BROKERAGE AND OTHER SLIPPAGE FEES. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

The Connors Group, Inc.
10 Exchange Place, Suite 1800
Jersey City, NJ 07302

© Copyright 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.


All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.