Quantcast
 
Read Larry Connors' blogShort Term Trading Strategies


 

Ebong is Certainly Not Disgraced [opinion]

Tue. October 27, 2009; Posted: 08:00 AM
Stocks RSS
Abuja, Oct 27, 2009 (This Day/All Africa Global Media via COMTEX) -- UBKFF | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- In most cases where judgment has been arrived at in haste, it is not inconceivable that grave injustice has been dealt to some of the people involved. One of such people I believe would be Barth Ebong of Union Bank, a gentleman banker hitherto without blemish.

Schooled in the finest tradition of the profession, Barth Ebong rose through the ranks to become Group Managing Director. What is significant about his case however is that he was named GMD at a point when he should have been due for retirement. However, having been adjudged brilliant and mature in handling his various portfolios prior, and having communicated the right kind of vision for Union bank going forward that board and management could relate with, he was promoted GMD. And after a first two-year term which helped define a new direction for the bank, the Board deemed it fit to renew his mandate for another two year term, the calculation being that he could complete some of the landmark projects he had begun in his first tenure.

One of those projects which had an industry wide resonance was the reform agenda. This was essentially a programme designed to enable Union Bank meet and overtake other players in the industry. Being a man who had spent all his working life as a staff of Union Bank, Ebong had been witness to a steady erosion of the bank's human capital base. Staff were always quick to bite the bait offered by competition, reason being that Union Bank salary, to put it charitably, was not competitive. And so one of the first things Ebong did as GMD was to increase salaries across board.

This done, he turned his focus to increasing the capital base. Not known for following the conventional, the Ebong team, which had contracted Accenture as strategic consultants, decided to shop for reputable foreign banks that would partner Union Bank and give it leverage with respect to fresh funds and human resources. This move, from all available evidence, was botched by CBN under Soludo. For reasons only the CBN can explain, this move was not ratified, we hear, because the then governor didn't feel comfortable about foreign banks owning a good chunk of any Nigerian Bank.

But seeing how it was critical to recapitalise, (although it must be said, not out of any dreary sense of imminent danger, but rather in an effort to make the bank more competitive and put on an unassailable sound footing), the bank thought it wise to make overtures to Nigeria's capital market. Unfortunately, the meltdown had erased the capital market's potentials. Those who made the stiff-necked decision of going ahead are still ruing their mistake.

Why am I going through this rigmarole? To make the point that results-yielding effort was going on in Union bank at a time of global slowdown. The issue for Union Bank was not about good corporate governance, neither was it about questionable credit management. If allusions are made to these by some people, one must be quick to say that some of the issues in question were beyond the realistic range of Mr. Ebong's management team. One of those issues was the loan to Transcorp, a loan which by the way makes up more than one third of the entire loan portfolio credited to Union Bank, and the basis for which Barth Ebong was relieved of his job.

That loan, beyond being a nationalistic imperative, driven by the Obasanjo administration desire to see a Nigerian creation in the mould of the fabled Asian Tigers, the investment was a business decision arrived at after proper due diligence that indicated overwhelmingly that NITEL was a good investment in every material particular.

That the management of Transcorp has been unable to leverage on NITEL's sound fundamentals does not vitiate this conclusion as we find that up till today blue chips both from home and abroad are lining up to indicate their interest in the acquisition of NITEL - debts and all.

Although Transcorp reneged on its loan payment, is it not a noteworthy development that it paid a good chunk of it right after Sanusi's heavy-handed action? Now, tell me, if the CBN had been just a little patient while engaging the coercive collaboration of the EFCC to help recover some of these loans, would Ebong today be deemed deserving of being out in the cold? I dare say no. Because even as I write this piece, Transcorp has made a payment of N23billion to Union Bank.

That payment reduces the bank's exposure significantly. Now add to this the fact that for whatever reasons, the Bank's assets valuation is not on current market value basis. If that had been done, there would have been no justification for describing the bank's position as weak, I dare say.

All of these beg the question: was there something else at play beyond righting the wrongs? It's a question we must ask as Nigerians and as people who want a stronger financial sector. Why punish a management that from all indications was doing the needful, and that was forging ahead despite vehement opposition from inside and outside interests used to creaming off from the business-as-usual model? It's been about three months now since Mr. Ebong voluntarily submitted himself to the EFCC after his sack was announced. Since then, there have been sobering and earth-shaking revelations from a few of the other banks. We've heard about money laundering, unduly generous allowances extended to executive and non executive management, we've heard about private jets, in some instances more than one, we've also heard about fresh loan scams from some of the banks. What I find revealing is that so far, beyond the initial charge of weak liquidity position, nothing new has been unearthed with regards to Union Bank.

I am one of the many people who are not surprised at all. Barth Ebong had always comported himself professionally. His being at the helm at a time of such turbulence was only going to prove the sterner stuff of which he is made. Unfortunately, just at the time his effort was beginning to bear fruit, he was yanked off the job. Incidentally, this at the same time when authorities in other countries were infusing their financial sectors with fresh funds rather than rocking the boat.

They recognize that a weak liquidity position today is not necessarily a reflection of bad management or lack of direction, but rather a global recession that requires government's assistance. All that a bank like Union Bank required was a fresh infusion of funds, something which was not done until Barth Ebong was hounded out. Today, his reformation template still serves as the guidebook by which the Bank is run.

One hopes that Malam Sanusi's sense of fairness will occasion a review of this particular case so that justice would neither be delayed nor denied a true gentleman.

Ikemefuna is an Abuja-based architect

For full details for UBKFF click here.

    


More News:   Market Updates | Stock Alerts | All Trading News | Stock Index

Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS





Related News [UBKFF]
  UPCOMING EVENTS
Learn new strategies, how to trade in this market, and the stocks you should be focusing on each day. Join us for our free 20 minute tele-seminars during the week.
* Attendance is strictly limited and are filled on a first-come, first-served basis.
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
 
The TradingMarkets Directory
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex
Please call 1-213-955-5858 ext. 1

About TradingMarkets | Contact | Advertise | Careers | Link to Us | Site Map | Help | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Return Policy | Testimonials | Feedback

Disclaimer:

The Connors Group, Inc. ("Company") is not an investment advisory service, nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities or currencies customers should buy or sell for themselves. The analysts and employees or affiliates of Company may hold positions in the stocks, currencies or industries discussed here. You understand and acknowledge that there is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities and/or currencies. The Company, the authors, the publisher, and all affiliates of Company assume no responsibility or liability for your trading and investment results. Factual statements on the Company's website, or in its publications, are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice.

It should not be assumed that the methods, techniques, or indicators presented in these products will be profitable or that they will not result in losses. Past results of any individual trader or trading system published by Company are not indicative of future returns by that trader or system, and are not indicative of future returns which be realized by you. In addition, the indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features of Company's products (collectively, the "Information") are provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Examples presented on Company's website are for educational purposes only. Such set-ups are not solicitations of any order to buy or sell. Accordingly, you should not rely solely on the Information in making any investment. Rather, you should use the Information only as a starting point for doing additional independent research in order to allow you to form your own opinion regarding investments. You should always check with your licensed financial advisor and tax advisor to determine the suitability of any investment.

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING AND MAY NOT BE IMPACTED BY BROKERAGE AND OTHER SLIPPAGE FEES. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

The Connors Group, Inc.
10 Exchange Place, Suite 1800
Jersey City, NJ 07302

© Copyright 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.


All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2009 The Connors Group, Inc.